Home > Question About > Question About Frontside Bus

Question About Frontside Bus

Posts: 4,274 It doesn't seem like PC3200 will ever have a JEDEC ratified standard so I think companies are waiting for DDR-2 for 200+ mhz speeds. Modern CPUs and motherboards don't have front side buses because the memory controller is now built into the CPU. This was my original intention with my new rig, I have 2x 2400+ (266Bus) and some 333Mhz, but so far I am still very impressed with my rig and have no Is it correct that a jet fighter can be used as a non-lethal (sonic) weapon? Source

TechSpot is a registered trademark. Related Resources Frontside bus question solved Do I have to change frontside bus cord when changing motherboards Frontside Bus what is the frontside bus of 939 soc. The potential of a faster CPU is wasted if it cannot fetch instructions and data as quickly as it can execute them. Chip Design magazine.

Keep in mind that memory speeds are also affected by the front-side bus speed. Normally, that's the FSB.The CPU core and FSB speeds are set based on a base frequency provided by the motherboard. The FSB is the bus that connects the CPU with the northbridge.

Retrieved June 14, 2011. ^ "XtremeData Offers Stratix III FPGA-Based Intel FSB Module". Whether or not it has better performance then the nForce2 platform remains to be seen, & there are also no known release dates for it. Many motherboards allow the user to manually set the clock multiplier and FSB settings by changing jumpers or BIOS settings. What memory do you have right now?

But yes, you will not see the performance increase in terms of bandwidth. Dual Channel DDR is well worth the money from what I've heard if you have a mobo that supports it. I believe this creates a bottleneck and if you aren’t going to overclock the FSB you are better off with 266 MHz DDR RAM - am I correct? Or does it mean those speeds are internal within its own line (L1/L2) cache?I ask because if it is talking about its own cache then doesn't that mean BSB speeds (backside

Retrieved June 14, 2011. ^ Allan McNaughton (September 29, 2003). "AMD HyperTransport Bus: Transport Your Application to Hyper Performance". L2 Cache? What component is the FSB part of? Nov 19, 2002 #1 conradguerrero TS Rookie Posts: 310 I don't think you can overclock the fsb.

These implementations remove the traditional northbridge in favor of a direct link from the CPU to the Platform Controller Hub, southbridge or I/O controller.[9] In a traditional architecture, the front-side bus This could result in a reasonable performance boost. The Inquirer. Nov 19, 2002 #3 Th3M1ghtyD8 TechSpot Paladin Posts: 664 Some motherboards support separate memory and FSB settings, i.e.

Nov 19, 2002 #8 iCE TS Rookie Topic Starter Posts: 25 Originally posted by Arris You would be better going with the 333fsb version of the 2600+ Click to expand... http://puchinet.com/question-about/question-about-irq-s.php In newer systems, it is possible to see memory ratios of "4:5" and the like. an issuera principala verifiera subject Previous question and answer: Taken from Cert-220-702Related Exam: CompTIA Cert-220-702 CompCert: A+ Practical Application Item Number: Cert-220-702.1.1.6You are assessing several computers to decide on a purchase The competing EV6 bus served the same function for AMD CPUs.

XtremeData. Pentium 4 front side bus speed Front side bus speeds Questions about front side bus solved Intel Front Side Bus interchangeable? If you have 2,400-MHz memory but a 600-MHz FSB, the memory will only be able to operate at 600 MHz.References:Front-side bus definition, http://www.techterms.com/definition/fsb Previous Questions Today 02/21/2017 02/20/2017 02/17/2017 02/16/2017 02/15/2017 have a peek here The PCH is connected to the CPU by both FDI and DMI.

Ask a new question Read More Bus Speed Bus CPUs Motherboards Memory Asus Related Resources Front side bus speed More Front Side Bus speed = better? CPUs are probably turning to 333Mhz as a new standard, so PC2100 and 1600 are quickly becoming outdated. Already have an account?

Question about bus idea.

solved Front Side bus speed comparison solved Front side bus speed? Some other processors from AMD and Intel are unlocked from the factory and labeled as an "enthusiast-grade" processors by end users and retailers because of this feature. The memory bus connects the northbridge and RAM, just as the front-side bus connects the CPU and northbridge. Join the community here, it only takes a minute.

I swear I overthink simple things.When I read a CPU specs and it talks about FSB speeds. It could be totally different. –David Schwartz Jul 6 '15 at 18:21 1 Yes, it's outdated. The boards should be ready in January and we'll be able to see if VIA has what it takes to out-tweak NVIDIA.Click to expand... http://puchinet.com/question-about/question-about-amd-am2.php There is no longer a single connection to the CPU that does all of that.

For all processors, increasing the FSB speed can be done to boost processing speed by reducing latency between CPU and the northbridge. It's always a good idea to get the fastest out there, but I wouldn't touch PC3200 DDR-1 modules with a 10 foot pole. On another note, a 200mhz FSB for an AthlonXp would be able to adress 3.2GB/s so wouldn't a Dual Channel PC2100 ( 2.1 GB/s ) be sufficient to saturate it ? The CPU architecture has changed so much I wouldn't assume anything that was the bottleneck way back when would be likely to be the bottleneck today.

A lot of motherboards are now allowing the memory and CPU to run synchronously so that you get a performance gain. 400 DDR has not been proven to provide a performance September 18, 2007. CYSYKOMember Since: October 10, 2003Posts: 573CYSYKOFollowForum Posts: 573Followed by: 0Reviews: 1 Stacks: 0Forum Karma: 0#7 Posted by CYSYKO (573 posts) - 9 years, 9 months ago[QUOTE="CYSYKO"]my front side bus is at Login now.

asynchronous operation, so memory accesses are slightly faster for example for DMA devices (which transfer to memory without CPU intervention), but the FSB will still limit performance of memory to some Nov 20, 2002 #13 Arris TS Evangelist Posts: 4,639 +323 From Techspot thread - http://www.techspot.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=3062&pagenumber=2 From www.anandtech.com Comdex day2 article : We also received full confirmation that VIA's KT400A will Whichever of those has the lowest max throughput is the bottleneck.